“A rendezvous with destiny”

In this 250th year of the United States, I’m writing a series called “The Cause.” “The Cause” was the initial name of the war for the independence of the United States.

Here are the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh installments.

Below is the eighth one.

On June 27, 1936 President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivers his speech accepting the Democratic presidential nomination at Franklin Field in Philadelphia before an audience of more than 100,000.

There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny.

In this world of ours in other lands, there are some people, who, in times past, have lived and fought for freedom, and seem to have grown too weary to carry on the fight. They have sold their heritage of freedom for the illusion of a living. They have yielded their democracy.

I believe in my heart that only our success can stir their ancient hope. They begin to know that here in America we are waging a great and successful war. It is not alone a war against want and destitution and economic demoralization. It is more than that; it is a war for the survival of democracy. We are fighting to save a great and precious form of government for ourselves and for the world.

These were the concluding paragraphs of Franklin Roosevelt’s 1936 speech accepting the Democratic Party nomination in Philadelphia.

This was the summer of Adolf Hitler’s Berlin Olympics, and the world was dazzled by the Nazi presentation. Headlines across America proclaimed word of the German miracle and dynamism of the Reich.

It didn’t much matter to the world that German Jews had been stripped of their citizenship, government jobs, and kicked out of universities, whether they were students or professors. The Nuremberg Race Laws were the legal foundation that became the basis for a mass dehumanization that led to the extermination of millions of human beings.

Those Nazi laws were modeled in part on anti-miscegenation laws from the American south that dehumanized Black people as "less than” legal. These laws were the reality-based rebuttal to the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address and the US Constitution’s 13th, 14th and 15th amendments.

Though it was Jesse Owens who shattered Hitler’s master race nonsense on the track, and was cheered across America for doing so, he represented a country that denied him basic rights across its former Confederate states.

The German nation was led by a Führer in 1936. The literal translation means “The Leader.” Society was organized around the party, the leader and the nation. The propaganda of the era made that clear. One people, one nation, one leader.

This was necessary and virtuous, the German people were told, because they were besieged by enemies. They were encircled by “lesser thans” who would seek to enslave them through democracy, where the Jews controlled their destinies from the shadows.

The Nazis were the response to national humiliation and a collapse of faith, spirit and hope. They were the rage of a people who threw away their freedom for the promise of order, safety and prosperity. What they yearned for within the decade was absolute destruction, yet in the summer of 1936 the swastika was ascendant, and the world was watching.

The American president was not yet Abraham Lincoln’s peer when he came forward to the podium, and declared a generation of Americans we remember today as the “Greatest Generation” had a “rendezvous with destiny.”

On June 27, 1936, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took the podium at the Democratic convention to accept its nomination for a second term. He began by noting that Philadelphia was a great city from which to make history.

He laid out the case for democracy, and more importantly, explained through his words how freedom could be lost to new forms of tyranny. Though some Americans wished to goose step alongside the Nazi Führer, the spirit of American individualism made that urge a peripheral one in 1936 American society.

Liberty was threatened by a different type of dictatorship in America, and FDR laid it out. He understood the vital link between economic and political liberty. He understood that economic devastation led to political instability, and ultimately, a loss of freedom.

His words have great resonance at this moment. They are a pristine explanation of America’s current condition and deserve to be refreshed because they so aptly answer a question that has confused the leadership of the Democratic National Committee for more than a decade. How did Trump win in 2016, and again in 2024?

Let FDR explain, with perfect clarity, 80 years earlier:

But I cannot, with candor, tell you that all is well with the world. Clouds of suspicion, tides of ill-will and intolerance gather darkly in many places. In our own land we enjoy indeed a fullness of life greater than that of most Nations. But the rush of modern civilization itself has raised for us new difficulties, new problems which must be solved if we are to preserve to the United States the political and economic freedom for which Washington and Jefferson planned and fought.

Philadelphia is a good city in which to write American history. This is fitting ground on which to reaffirm the faith of our fathers; to pledge ourselves to restore to the people a wider freedom; to give to 1936 as the founders gave to 1776 — an American way of life.

That very word freedom, in itself and of necessity, suggests freedom from some restraining power. In 1776 we sought freedom from the tyranny of a political autocracy — from the eighteenth century royalists who held special privileges from the crown. It was to perpetuate their privilege that they governed without the consent of the governed; that they denied the right of free assembly and free speech; that they restricted the worship of God; that they put the average man’s property and the average man’s life in pawn to the mercenaries of dynastic power; that they regimented the people.

And so it was to win freedom from the tyranny of political autocracy that the American Revolution was fought. That victory gave the business of governing into the hands of the average man, who won the right with his neighbors to make and order his own destiny through his own Government. Political tyranny was wiped out at Philadelphia on July 4, 1776.

Since that struggle, however, man’s inventive genius released new forces in our land which reordered the lives of our people. The age of machinery, of railroads; of steam and electricity; the telegraph and the radio; mass production, mass distribution — all of these combined to bring forward a new civilization and with it a new problem for those who sought to remain free.

For out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital — all undreamed of by the fathers — the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service.

There was no place among this royalty for our many thousands of small businessmen and merchants who sought to make a worthy use of the American system of initiative and profit. They were no more free than the worker or the farmer. Even honest and progressive-minded men of wealth, aware of their obligation to their generation, could never know just where they fitted into this dynastic scheme of things.

It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over Government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its service new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor, and their property. And as a result, the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man.

The hours men and women worked, the wages they received, the conditions of their labor — these had passed beyond the control of the people, and were imposed by this new industrial dictatorship. The savings of the average family, the capital of the small businessman, the investments set aside for old age — other people’s money — these were tools which the new economic royalty used to dig itself in.

Those who tilled the soil no longer reaped the rewards which were their right. The small measure of their gains was decreed by men in distant cities.

Throughout the Nation, opportunity was limited by monopoly. Individual initiative was crushed in the cogs of a great machine. The field open for free business was more and more restricted. Private enterprise, indeed, became too private. It became privileged enterprise, not free enterprise.

An old English judge once said: “Necessitous men are not free men.” Liberty requires opportunity to make a living — a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to live by, but something to live for.

Before continuing, dwell for a second on the “something to live for” declaration, and consider the suicide epidemic, addiction epidemic, homelessness epidemic, mass shooting epidemic, loneliness epidemic, and rise of social media, before absorbing what comes next:

For too many of us, the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people’s property, other people’s money, other people’s labor — other people’s lives. For too many of us, life was no longer free, liberty no longer real, men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.

Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of Government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it was. The election of 1932 was the people’s mandate to end it. Under that mandate it is being ended.

The royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom was the business of the Government, but they have maintained that economic slavery was nobody’s business. They granted that the Government could protect the citizen in his right to vote, but they denied that the Government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live.

Today we stand committed to the proposition that freedom is no half-and-half affair. If the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the marketplace.

These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike.

The brave and clear platform adopted by this Convention, to which I heartily subscribe, sets forth that Government in a modern civilization has certain inescapable obligations to its citizens, among which are protection of the family and the home, the establishment of a democracy of opportunity, and aid to those overtaken by disaster.

But the resolute enemy within our gates is ever ready to beat down our words unless in greater courage we will fight for them.

For more than three years we have fought for them. This Convention, in every word and deed, has pledged that that fight will go on.

The defeats and victories of these years have given to us as a people a new understanding of our Government and of ourselves. Never since the early days of the New England town meeting have the affairs of Government been so widely discussed and so clearly appreciated. It has been brought home to us that the only effective guide for the safety of this most worldly of worlds, the greatest guide of all, is moral principle.

We do not see faith, hope and charity as unattainable ideals, but we use them as stout supports of a Nation fighting the fight for freedom in a modern civilization.

Faith — in the soundness of democracy in the midst of dictatorships.

Hope — renewed because we know so well the progress we have made.

Charity — in the true spirit of that grand old word. For charity literally translated from the original means love, the love that understands, that does not merely share the wealth of the giver, but in true sympathy and wisdom helps men to help themselves.

We seek not merely to make Government a mechanical implement, but to give it the vibrant personal character that is the very embodiment of human charity.

We are poor indeed if this Nation cannot afford to lift from every recess of American life the dread fear of the unemployed that they are not needed in the world. We cannot afford to accumulate a deficit in the books of human fortitude.

In the place of the palace of privilege we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and charity.

It is a sobering thing, my friends, to be a servant of this great cause. We try in our daily work to remember that the cause belongs not to us, but to the people. The standard is not in the hands of you and me alone. It is carried by America. We seek daily to profit from experience, to learn to do better as our task proceeds.

Governments can err, Presidents do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of the warm-hearted in different scales.

Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.

What Franklin Roosevelt laid out is an indictment of our age of selfishness in which an accumulation of factors has arisen in perfect symmetry with the most dangerous man in American history. Donald Trump is a liar, a cheat, a narcissistic sociopath, a convicted sex abuser and conman.

He is well on his way to becoming an American Caesar, unequal in stature, above the law and in absolute control over vast institutions that can yield power through control.

The American citizen is becoming a leashed dog tethered to the state, which grants favors to some, and punishment to others.

This must be opposed.

It must be defeated — or we will lose America, and there is nowhere left to go.

---